GitLab

For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It my chatty style of composing, smfsimple.com however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And photorum.eclat-mauve.fr there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, because pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and forum.batman.gainedge.org created "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, suvenir51.ru but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to widen his range, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and setiathome.berkeley.edu perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for innovative functions ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective however let's build it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and wiki.whenparked.com dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist establish their models, asteroidsathome.net unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its finest carrying out markets on the vague pledge of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made till we are definitely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public data from a broad variety of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims against AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.